One of the most dangerous forms of attack an organization can face comes from the inside—whether through a disgruntled employee, a trusted partner, or, as we’ll explore today, a seemingly reputable supplier.
Insider threats are effective because the perpetrators have already been vetted and trusted, giving them access to sensitive information, processes, or products that would otherwise be secure. The very nature of this trust often lowers defenses, making it easier for the attacker to carry out their plan over time without raising suspicion.
Nowhere is this clearer than in the case of supply chain vulnerabilities. When we trust a vendor to supply critical infrastructure or tools, we open the door to insider-like threats. A supply company, especially one that has built a track record of reliability, may slip under the radar of scrutiny, allowing attackers to exploit these relationships. In the recent attack on Hezbollah, this scenario played out on a devastating scale.
It should be noted that while the Mossad are the most likely group to have conducted this operation, neither they nor Israel have commented as of the writing of this article about this event.
Hezbollah’s Pager Explosion: A Classic Supply Chain Attack
The recent explosion of pagers used by Hezbollah members marks a significant intelligence operation, widely believed to have been orchestrated by Israel’s Mossad. This attack targeted Hezbollah’s communication infrastructure, specifically its use of low-tech pagers, which the group had adopted to evade mobile tracking by state actors like Israel. The pagers, identified as Gold Apollo AR-924 models, were compromised at the supply chain level, with small explosive devices covertly implanted during manufacturing.
Experts suggest that up to 3 grams of explosives or around 20 grams of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) were hidden inside each pager. It is assumed that the explosives were either inside the casing or in the case of PETN, would have replaced the battery to create a small explosive when the battery overheated.
These were detonated remotely through a coded signal, affecting over 3,000 Hezbollah operatives and civilians across Lebanon. The attack caused mass casualties, with many users receiving an error message right before the pagers exploded
Hezbollah had shifted to using these pagers to avoid detection by sophisticated tracking tools used for mobile devices. However, this reliance became their vulnerability. Mossad reportedly exploited the pagers during production, seamlessly integrating explosives that were nearly impossible to detect. The devices were shipped to Hezbollah, who had no reason to suspect foul play from a trusted supplier. This breach highlights how deeply state actors can penetrate a supply chain when they have the patience and expertise.
The simultaneous detonation was a highly coordinated effort, underscoring the intense planning likely required to execute this type of cyber-physical attack. The precision of this operation shows the complex interplay between cyber espionage, physical sabotage, and human intelligence.
My Thoughts On The Kill chain
The longer a supplier works with you, the more inclined you are to trust them implicitly. This prolonged relationship can become an attacker’s greatest asset. Over time, regular deliveries from a supplier foster a sense of security. Each successful transaction reduces the likelihood that you will double-check the products or services being delivered. If an attacker were to infiltrate a trusted supply chain, they could slowly and methodically map out your vulnerabilities, gaining insight into how your organization functions, who your key players are, and what weaknesses exist.
In Hezbollah's case, the method used to attack likely followed a kill chain similar to the one below:
Identify Targets: Mossad would first gather intelligence on Hezbollah's operations, pinpointing high-value targets—such as couriers, field operatives, or command staff—who rely on the pagers for communication. A part of this recon would note that due to a fear of using conventional phones, Hezbollah opted to use a pager system. Unfortunately for Hezbollah, realizing that many of their agents were using an electronic device from a single vendor was a massive security flaw.
Locate the Pager Supplier: Once the key personnel were identified, the next step would be to discover the supplier or manufacturer providing the pagers to Hezbollah. The brilliance of this step is that if Mossad confidently knew the supplier, than they wouldn’t necessarily need to know all the operatives connected to the pagers. Hezbollah themselves would disseminate these devices to any agent associated within the organization because they trusted the supplier. Effectively, Hezbollah handed out bombs to their own operatives
Infiltrate the Supply Chain: Mossad could have pursued one of two likely routes—or both.
They may have intercepted a shipment of pagers and secretly wired them with micro-explosives before sending them on to Hezbollah’s real supplier.
Alternatively, they could have set up or acquired a company that was a legitimate supplier, then gradually distributed the rigged devices over time. Allegedly the pagers were made by BAC Consulting from Hungary, which had been in the distribution process of these pagers for over three years before this event. Which means these operatives could have been carrying around these explosives for a long time.
Execute the Attack: Once enough pagers were in place, Mossad would trigger the devices simultaneously, causing mass chaos and inflicting maximum damage on Hezbollah’s ranks. Doing the attack simultaneously limits the ability for survivors or bystanders to warn any other members of the group.
One of the brilliant steps in this attack and why I lean more towards the patient attack vector rather than simply grabbing a crate of pagers to weaponize, is that requiring new devices takes time, how often do you replace your phone for instance. By creating or taking over the pager supply company, or organization within the supply chain, Mossad could slowly give out these pagers over months or years to maximize the effectiveness of the attack.
That said, an alternative may be true if Hezbollah mandated the pagers be replaced periodically to limit possible compromise. If for example, they had decided that all members would replace electronic devices, pagers included, periodically and Mossad learned of this, they would only need to spike that one shipment.
Of course this is still speculation and we may learn new details as time progresses.
Conclusion
The Hezbollah pager explosions are a textbook example of how vulnerable even the most secure organizations can be when it comes to their supply chains. The longer you trust a supplier, the more complacent you may become, and this is where attackers thrive. They rely on the erosion of vigilance over time to insert themselves into your operations.
In conclusion, while insider threats traditionally come from within the organization, trusted third parties, like suppliers, can represent an equally dangerous avenue for compromise. Just as Hezbollah learned in this deadly attack, the price of misplaced trust can be catastrophic. Regular vigilance, continuous vetting, and a healthy level of skepticism, even with trusted partners, are essential in preventing similar attacks.
Training Resources:
For individuals looking for a hands on training that includes all of the above topics, Covert Access Team (covertaccessteam.com) provides training courses focused on physical penetration testing, lockpicking, bypassing techniques, social engineering and other essential skills.
Covert Access Training - 5 day hands on course designed to train individuals and groups to become Covert Entry Specialists
Physical Audit Training - 2 day course on how to setup and run a physical security audit
Elicitation Toolbox Course - 2 day course of that primarily focuses on elicitation and social engineering as critical aspects of Black Teaming
Counter Elicitation - 2 day course on how to recognize and prevent elicitation attempts, and safegaurd your secrets.
Cyber Bootcamp for Black Teams - 2 day course designed explicitly for physical penetration testers who need vital cyber skills to add to their toolbox.
Private Instruction - Focused learning & training based on your needs .